Meet OPR: Dallas ISD's Secret Police

Elite million-dollar fraud squad fails to land even one indictment

Former government agents, law enforcement executives, IRS officials--most of whom held top secret security clearances; these are just some of the qualifications dotting the resumes of DISD's most elite and perhaps its most secret department.

The Office of Professional Responsibility hired its first employee, Donald R. Smith, Jr. on February 26, 2007.

Since then, its documented budget has soared to almost $1.5 million dollars a year. 

According to information received from DISD through an open records request, 20 employees (currently being pared down to 7) have been associated with or assigned to the department (though the records themselves indicate confusion). 

Their combined salaries exceed the $1.4 million dollar mark--leading to questions as to whether the true cost of the department's operation will ever be known.

So what does the department actually do?

The OPR was created in the wake of the District's procurement card scandal.

Its purpose, at the time, was to investigate fraud--including a pledge by District Superintendent Michael Hinojosa that OPR was his mechanism for getting tough on those who abused the District's procurement cards.

According to sources at DISD, the ongoing procurement card investigations really never materialized.

Trying to get to the bottom of what the organization actually does, Dallas.Org submitted an open records request asking for "front page" information from all police reports where OPR had something to do with the investigations along with "activity reports, summaries, statistical documents or other correspondence evidencing services performed by the Office of Professional Responsibility."

This request returned four police reports along with a 4-page Powerpoint presentation.

When we asked for confirmation that the elite fraud-fighting unit had only called the police 4 times in its year-and-a-half existence, DISD officials clarified the number was actually 11 times.  Many of the cases were taken directly to the District Attorney's office as opposed to being routed through DISD's police department.

Whatever the case, to date, none of the investigations conducted by OPR has resulted in a prosecution.  One case was referred to the grand jury where it was "no-billed."

As for the four police reports furnished to Dallas.Org, only one of the incidents actually mentioned theft.  The report was closed by DISD police without a prosecution being filed.

Another report was made as the result of an OPR investigation involving "offensive [and] harassing" letters (including drawings/pictures of sex organs) left for teachers at a DISD elementary school.  After producing what sources inside DISD called a "voluminous report" on the matter, the case was supposedly dropped.

According to sources in DISD, the culprit was believed to have been a student.

According to OPR Investigator Pete Nielsen, the elite fraud-fighting unit reports exclusively to Hinojosa and Human Development Director Kim Olson.  The unit produces no executive summaries or briefs.  OPR Director Donald Smith, verbally updates Hinojosa in bi-weekly meetings.

DISD Board members, most notably Lew Blackburn, have complained about the inability to get information about OPR and what it does.

Nielsen disputes this.  "There's nothing secret about what we're doing."

OPR has recently been the focus of two high-profile television investigations.

In one, WFAA Ace Reporter Brett Shipp uncovered that OPR conducted an investigation into allegations by teachers that a student's grades were being changed to make him eligible to compete in basketball.  OPR investigators dismissed the allegations (read the story). 

In response to the story, however, Hinojosa decided to commission an outside investigation.

In another, Shipp found that OPR conducted an investigation of a DISD principal who allegedly started rumors about Hinojosa having an affair with a teacher (read the story).

The teacher was ultimately demoted after OPR's 64-page investigation found that she had gossiped to 4 employees instead of two.

Hinojosa defended OPR's work to Channel 8.

"We have highly credentialed people there," Hinojosa told Shipp. "They've worked in very important organizations, including the Internal Revenue Service, the Federal Bureau of Investigation; they are highly credentialed."

In response to the increased scrutiny, OPR is preparing an "annual report" on its activities.  The report is expected in early November.


Office of Professional Responsibility Employee Resumes

The following resumes were furnished in connection with an open records request and may reflect employees no longer with the department.

* Note: According to Nielsen, Weaver was never part of OPR.  District records may be in error.

One of Your Best Efforts

Isn't this fascinating? I'd say it's one of your best efforts.

By the way, Chris Lyle, mentioned as part of OPR, is ex- supt Yvonne Gonzalez's (of bedroom furniture fame) husband.

DISD has always favored in-breeding and nepotism and family legacies handed down from generation to generation in terms of central administrative jobs.

Yvonne toted her willing husband with her when she was recruited by none other than John Scovell.

Regarding OPR, it's such a waste to have all these highly credentialed people investigating campus crimes, when they know next to nothing about schools.

How about they investigate what REALLY happened to the $64M missing last year and the potential $84M missing this year?

Some of them actually have the credentials to do so, but since their investigation might run contrary to Hinojosa's reputation, we know we'll never see what needs to be done.

As far as the Pcard thieves, they are still on the payroll, and many have been promoted.

OPR's lone reason for existing simply disappeared. To have done anything about the pcard debacle would have meant asst. superintendents, principals, LULAC leaders, and other Hinojosa favorites would have had to take a ride to the DA's office.

Remember when Hinojosa told the DMN that anyone with missing receipts would have to pay back expenses on their Pcards? That never happened, did it?

So OPR now functions in the shadows, and we now know they are not even capable of reading transcripts. In other words, they are pretty much pointless, just like Hinojosa.

Thanks for the effort, Allen.

So if all these people were released tomorrow, what would be any different? Hinojosa would simply send his dirty laundry to some skanky attorneys willing to do his bidding.

Think of the half-witted attorneys who would be out some major bucks if this district were reorganized. State senators, Ghouliani&Bracewell have taken up with Moses, Feldman, Ronquillo, and Moye would all have to get real jobs with real consequences for being total losers. All the fun they have with our tax monies would simply disappear. They would no longer have clients where the house always wins.

[Ed Note: Do me a favor and let's don't name call Hinojosa. I know there's quite a bit of angst out there, but he bears no ill will against anyone. He simply seems to be "administratively challenged" in some very core areas. Like budgets :) ]

Point of the OPR Article

I guess one of the core points of this article is that, like so many things at DISD, OPR became something other than what it was originally designed to be.

Pete was very clear in pointing out that "there is no mission statement" for OPR (something, by the way, we asked for in one of our earlier requests).

Here, again, we get into cost/benefit. What are the benefits of this department as opposed to its costs?

Quite a few of these guys availed themselves of "free" continuing ed opportunities and received more certifications to hang on the wall.

But their main purpose seems to be to write voluminous reports (on even dubious stuff like elementary school kids drawing pictures of body parts) and keep as much stuff under wraps as possible--only releasing what they absolutely have to.

Given that they only report to Hinojosa with a "dotted line" to Olson, there is very little oversight.

With even the best people (by the way, I put Pete Nielsen into this category--he's a very decent guy) this is a recipe for problems.

Bureaucracy is sometimes self-perpetuating for the sake of bureaucracy.

So I guess the question is: is this a situation where you have a bunch of otherwise good guys doing a job they feel is vitally important that, when put into context, isn't as important as its cracked up to be?

Rex Stewart

Yes, being a substitute teacher and certified photographer is for sure "highly credentialed". Please recall this is the investigator responsible for investigating Mary Davies for gossip about the Supe. Also, I noticed that Charlene failed to note her kinship with an Executive Director. That is a conflict of interest.

Wondered Why

Her resume had all kinds of red flags. It was apparent that she was simply placed in OPR by someone for some reason other than credentials.

The bigger issue is that the entire department is a conflict of interest, because if the corruption goes all the way to the top, to whom do they report it? If there is a coverup in terms of their delivery of information to Hinojosa and his refusal to act on it, where are their loyalties? To the taxpayers who really foot the bill, or to their boss? Why no paper trail to the bossman? This reaks of the same issues as the lack of paper trail over finances. Why is government business being conducted in this fashion, unless there are severe character issues involved?

For them to be reporting to Kim Olson is akin to having the IRS report to Karl Rove.

As far as Dallas ISD returning to an honest administration, hasn't happened in 25 years. Hinojosa's budget blowout is simply a more public display of business as usual.

Martinez in Investigation?

Does anyone care to comment on how Rene Martinez wound up in the investigation of the Spence principal?

Rene Martinez

Gone but not forgotten. Oh, do tell of the tangled webs, woven !!